You may have seen the news on Wednesday that the Supreme Court judgment in the Staveley inheritance tax case has been released, bringing the case to a close six years after the First Tier Tribunal ruling.
We’ve highlighted the key points below, or you can click the button below to read a more detailed analysis and the background to the case.
- Omission to take pension benefits: Mrs Staveley’s decision not to access her pension funds did create an inheritance tax liability – however, this shouldn’t affect recent cases following a rule change in 2011
- Transferring while in ill-health: Mrs Staveley’s decision to transfer her pension weeks before her death has not created an inheritance tax liability
- The judgment clarifies when actions can be considered together as a series of transactions to confer benefits
- The judgment questions whether death benefits can be conferred as part of a pension transfer, as beneficiaries don’t have any benefits or rights while the pension holder is alive
- The judgment appears to question whether a pension transfer would always be a transfer of value, by rejecting HMRC’s ‘return to zero’ approach.
Keep up to date with our latest news and updates. Curtis Banks Insights.